Tuesday, 27 May 2014
Impeachment: Court dismisses Amaechi’s case against lawmakers
A Rivers State High Court sitting in Port
Harcourt, on Monday, dismissed a suit filed by
Governor Rotimi Amaechi against members of
the state House of Assembly from impeaching
him.
The case was between Amaechi (claimant) and
the state House of Assembly, Speaker,
Otelemaba Dan-Amachree (excluding the five
anti-Amaechi lawmakers, as first set of
defendants/respondents), as well as Evans Bipi,
Victor Ihunwo, Michael Chinda, Martins
Amaewhule and Kelechi Nwogu (as second set
of defendants/respondents).
Giving his ruling, the trial judge, Justice
George Omereji, struck out the suit on grounds
that Governor Amaechi did not disclose any
reasonable cause of action in the petition,
adding that the governor’s claim was not
justiciable and, therefore, incompetent.
All the reliefs sought for by the claimant,
including restraining the respondents from
carrying out impeachment process against him
and the act of harassment, intimidation, threat
and abuse on the first set of defendants by the
chairman and secretary of the Rivers Peoples
Democratic Party (PDP), Felix Obuah and
Walter Ibibia Opuene respectively, were
quashed in favour of the second set of
defendants.
Justice Omereji pointed out that the claimant
mentioned the names of Obuah and Opuene in
the case for “criminal wrongdoings” without
substantiating his claims against them.
He maintained that there was no way someone,
who was mentioned for criminal wrongdoings,
would not be given an opportunity for fair
hearing, adding that it would amount to abuse
of justice and personal human rights.
“If the court goes ahead on its ruling on the
persons mentioned in the suit without giving
them opportunity to defend themselves, it
would amount to unfair hearing”, he said.
He further said the claimant did not give
reasonable cause of action to show that there
was a plot to remove him by the second set of
respondents, adding that it was in the mind of
the claimant that there was such a plot
underway.
He also pointed out that the “allegation of
harassing, intimidating, abusing and
threatening” the first set of defendants by
Obuah and Opuene, were not on the claimant,
and, therefore, was incompetent.
Counsel for the second set of defendants, Dike
Udenna, asked court to award N1 million cost to
his clients but was countered by counsel for the
claimant, Beluolisa Nwofor, who argued that
Udenna’s clients did not appear in personal
capacity but as members of the state House of
Assembly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment