Monday 2 June 2014
Presidency may not respond to Obasanjo’s criticism[PUNCH]
The Presidency may have decided for now not to join
issues with former President Olusegun Obasanjo over
his latest comment on how President Goodluck
Jonathan was handling the abduction of over 200
schoolgirls by Boko Haram.
Obasanjo had in an interview said Jonathan did not
believe that girls were missing. He also said that the
abducted girls would have been rescued if the President
had acted swiftly and that Jonathan had so far
performed below the expectation of Nigerians.
The PUNCH however learnt on Sunday that Jonathan’s
aides might have decided to keep quiet because of the
relationship that still existed between their boss and
the former President.
A government source in Abuja said the Presidency
would not want a situation where its reaction would be
seen as another confrontation with the former leader.
The source said contrary to Obasanjo’s claims,
Nigerians were aware that the President never said there
was no missing girl, adding that Jonathan had since put
machinery in place to ensure the girls rescue.
He said, “The truth is that everybody is aware that the
President is working hard to ensure that the schoolgirls
are rescued and he has received international support in
that regards.
“Apart from the efforts of security agencies, President
Jonathan has also set up a fact-finding commission on
the matter. This is also in the public domain.
“Answering the former leader directly will mean that
we are confronting him again. The Presidency does not
want to be seen as engaging Obasanjo in another
public fight.
“Many people know Obasanjo for who he is. Our
thinking is that we do not need to engage him in any
altercation.
“This is the same man that whenever he sees the
President, he will give him courtesies and they will
discuss heart-to-heart, then he will go and say
something again.
“Then if we keep fighting him, it will serve the purpose
of those who will say the President is fighting his
benefactor, that he is fighting everybody.”
The Special Adviser to the President on Media and
Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, could not be reached on
the telephone at the time of filing this report.
The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public
Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, did not answer his calls when
contacted on the telephone.
He did not respond to a text message sent to him by
one of our correspondents as of press time.
But the All Progressives Congress said on Sunday that
Obasanjo’s comment had vindicated its position on
Jonathan’s handling of the Boko Haram insurgency.
The party, through its Interim National Publicity
Secretary , Alhaji Lai Mohammed, said the Jonathan
administration had not only been living in self denial
but also seeking to make political gain out of the
insurgency.
The APC said, “There is nothing the former President
said that does not tally with what we’ve been saying all
along.
“That the President rather than look at the Boko Haram
as a real menace to the country has been busy trying to
reap political gains out of it and in the process it
became a monster.
“Now, they have linked up with better organised terror
groups from across the world. they have become a
global terror group.”
Noting however that this was not the time to pass the
bulk, the party urged all Nigerians of good conscience
to come together to deal with the problem.
It reiterated its offer to assist the Jonathan
administration to deal with the issues through the
convocation of a national security summit.
But the pan-Yoruba cultural organisation, Afenifere,
dismissed Obasanjo as attempting to score cheap
political points instead of cutting the image of a
statesman.
The group’s spokesman, Yinka Odumakin, said the
comments attributed to the former President was the
most uncharitable.
He said “Given the closeness of some top security
chiefs to Obasanjo, his statement is a clear testimony to
the fact that a script is behind this whole saga and
Obasanjo may be privy to the dummy sold to Jonathan
which eventually made his response uncoordinated in
the first few days after the abduction.
“The visible government which Jonathan heads has not
looked pretty good over this Chibok issue but a deeper
inquest will show that the invisible government which
Obasanjo appears to be working for schemed
everything to be so.
“The surprise in all these is that Jonathan has not taken
any action against those security chiefs who told him
the lie that those girls were rescued.
“He should tell the whole country what his
recommendations were after he met with Boko Haram.
“But he should not confuse us that the insurgency we
are dealing with now is the same as the rag-tag Yusuf
forces.That would be highly disingenuous.”
He also said that in playing politics over this matter,
Obasanjo should not assume that Nigerians could not
think through what he said.
Also, the National Coordinator of the Niger Delta
Youth Parliament, Mr. Imoh Okoko, said it was wrong
for the former President to blame Jonathan for the
activities of Boko Haram, particularly the kidnap of
the Chibok girls.
Okoko explained that rather than blame the President ,
the Borno State Governor, Kashim Shettima, should
take the blame for the abduction.
He said, “I don’t think President Jonathan should be
blamed over the Boko Haram insurgency because he
(Jonathan) is not the cause of the current crisis in the
North.
“What everybody, including Obasanjo should do is to
proffer solution to this problem .
“The Governor of Borno State, who is the chief security
officer of that state, should be blamed. The governor
ought to have made moves when the schoolgirls were
kidnapped.
“People were kidnapped in the past in the Niger Delta
and nobody pointed accusing finger at the person who
was the President of the country at that time.”
Okoko, who acknowledged Obasanjo’s bid to reach out
to Boko Haram, described Jonathan as a listening
leader .
A Lagos-based lawyer, Fred Agbaje, said the
Presidency would not have responded to the abduction
without condemnation from the international
community.
Agbaje said, “I actually believe what Obasanjo said.
He spoke the minds of so many. Why was the Federal
Government dilly dallying on the abduction of the
girls before the condemnation by the international
community.
“To make things worse, the television drama by the
President’s wife, Patience, showed that the President
did not believe that the girls were abducted.”
He called on the government to ensure the release of
the girls through all possible means, including
negotiating with the sect.
“The Federal Government should come down from its
Olympian height and ensure the release of the girls,”
the lawyer added.[PUNCH]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment